Planning and roadmap
This chapter is the readable version of the HIIP work plan. The single source of truth remains the workbook HIIP_full_plan_EN.xlsx, on its Master tab; what appears here is generated from it and is meant for reading and discussion, not for editing.
The plan covers 12 workstreams, 49 outputs and 176 tasks, spread over fortnightly sprints from 3 August 2026 to 30 July 2027. 29 tasks are done (16%) and 6 are in progress; 3 have been abandoned and are kept for the record. All tasks are assigned to the project manager.
Delayed and Critical flags are computed from the dates as of 22 September 2026, when this chapter was generated.
How to read this plan
The plan has three levels, and the distinction between them is what makes it usable. A workstream produces a product and is the only level with external validation. An output is an intermediate delivery that closes within one or two sprints, and is the only level with a definition of done. A task is the concrete work: it has no criteria of its own, being specific enough that once carried out it is done.
The separation that matters most is between the definition of done and external validation. The definition of done is a set of internal criteria under the project manager’s control: the output closes when they are met. External validation is acceptance by the client — the TWG-PHC, the TWG-PFM, the Minister, the financiers — with its own date and outside the project manager’s control. A product can meet every internal criterion and still not be validated.
The plan also records deadlocks: local constraints that stop an output from being achieved even when the work is ready to proceed. A deadlock is not a delay in the work; it is the reason the work cannot move.
Some tasks have no output. That is not an omission: they serve the workstream’s external validation directly, without passing through an intermediate delivery, and are grouped separately under each workstream.
| Level or flag | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Task | Backlog (identified) - To do (committed to the sprint) - In progress - Blocked (held up by third parties) - Done - Abandoned. |
| Output | Not started - In progress - Delayed - Critical - Done - Abandoned. |
| Validation | Not started - In progress - Delayed - Critical - Done - Abandoned. |
| Delayed (orange) | The date is less than two weeks away and the work has not started. The colour appears automatically. |
| Critical (red) | The date has passed and the output is not done. The colour appears automatically. |
| Abandoned (grey, struck through) | Output or task no longer part of the plan. Kept for the record; not counted in sprint load. |
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Sprint | Planned fortnight. Dates on the Sprints tab. ‘Recurring’ repeats in every sprint; ‘TBC’ awaits a date. |
| Estimate | Working days. A first approximation, to be corrected with use. |
| Depends on | What must be completed first. If it is not, the task is Blocked, not late. |
| Deadlock | Local constraint preventing the output from being achieved, even when the work is ready to proceed. When filled in, the cell turns purple. |
| Learning | Critical information that emerged while carrying out the task: consequences, new data, problems recognised. Filled in as the work is done and reviewed at the sprint retrospective. |
Learning that changes the plan does not stay in the column: it becomes a change to the definition of done, a new task, or a line in the risk log.
Workstreams at a glance
Each workstream has its own section below, with its external validation, outputs and tasks. The validation dates are what structure the calendar: they do not move for internal convenience.
| Workstream | Validation | Outputs | Tasks | Done | Deadlocked | Sprints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWG-PHC | 23 October 2026 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | S3–S9 |
| Background document - PHC | 6 November 2026 | 7 | 31 | 16 | — | S1–S7 |
| Strategy document - PHC | 20 November 2026 | 3 | 9 | 0 | — | S5–S8 |
| HHFA and situational diagnosis | 18 December 2026 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 3 | S3–S10 |
| PFM | 18 December 2026 | 5 | 24 | 13 | — | S1–S10 |
| Investment case - PHC | 26 February 2027 | 4 | 13 | 0 | — | S5–S14 |
| PHC investment plan (costed) | 23 April 2027 | 5 | 15 | 0 | — | S11–S20 |
| Essential package - PHC | 15 January 2027 | 4 | 9 | 0 | — | S8–S11 |
| Care model and professional profiles - PHC | 15 January 2027 | 4 | 13 | 0 | — | S6–S10 |
| Project scoping - PHC | 23 April 2027 | 2 | 6 | 0 | — | S6–S18 |
| Financing mobilisation - PHC | 18 June 2027 | 2 | 8 | 0 | — | S17–S21 |
| HIIP contractual reporting | — | 2 | 4 | 0 | — | S3–S25 |
- Deadlock Awaiting developments with MINSA — TWG-PHC (18 tasks).
- Deadlock Agreement with UNICEF and UNFPA abandoned; replaced by the approach to GEPE — HHFA and situational diagnosis (3 tasks).
| Sprint | Start | End | Tasks | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 3 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 | 3 | 6 |
| S2 | 17 August 2026 | 28 August 2026 | 3 | 6 |
| S3 | 31 August 2026 | 11 September 2026 | 27 | 48 |
| S4 | 14 September 2026 | 25 September 2026 | 11 | 28 |
| S5 | 28 September 2026 | 9 October 2026 | 25 | 73 |
| S6 | 12 October 2026 | 23 October 2026 | 25 | 53 |
| S7 | 26 October 2026 | 6 November 2026 | 11 | 24 |
| S8 | 9 November 2026 | 20 November 2026 | 10 | 25 |
| S9 | 23 November 2026 | 4 December 2026 | 10 | 28 |
| S10 | 7 December 2026 | 18 December 2026 | 10 | 30 |
| S11 | 4 January 2027 | 15 January 2027 | 6 | 17 |
| S12 | 18 January 2027 | 29 January 2027 | 3 | 13 |
| S13 | 1 February 2027 | 12 February 2027 | 2 | 13 |
| S14 | 15 February 2027 | 26 February 2027 | 4 | 12 |
| S15 | 1 March 2027 | 12 March 2027 | 1 | 8 |
| S16 | 15 March 2027 | 26 March 2027 | 2 | 6 |
| S17 | 29 March 2027 | 9 April 2027 | 3 | 19 |
| S18 | 12 April 2027 | 23 April 2027 | 4 | 12 |
| S19 | 26 April 2027 | 7 May 2027 | 3 | 9 |
| S20 | 10 May 2027 | 21 May 2027 | 2 | 8 |
| S21 | 24 May 2027 | 4 June 2027 | 1 | 5 |
| S22 | 7 June 2027 | 18 June 2027 | 0 | 0 |
| S23 | 21 June 2027 | 2 July 2027 | 0 | 0 |
| S24 | 5 July 2027 | 16 July 2027 | 0 | 0 |
| S25 | 19 July 2027 | 30 July 2027 | 1 | 5 |
| Recurring | — | — | 6 | 8 |
| TBC | — | — | 0 | 0 |
The contractual calendar
The plan answers to a contract. The Proposal for Action recognises three contractual deliverables and two reports, scheduled in project months; every other product in the plan is intermediate work supporting them. Where the plan’s dates and the contract’s diverge, the contract prevails.
| Contractual deliverable | Activity | Months | Period | Workstream in the plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deliverable 1: Costed PHC Investment Plan developed and launched | Consultants recruitment | M1 | 1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 | PHC investment plan (costed) |
| PHC desk review, situation assessment | M2–M3 | 1 September 2026 – 31 October 2026 | Background document - PHC | |
| Identification of priority interventions guided by the 14 WHO/UNICEF operational framework levers | M6–M7 | 1 January 2027 – 28 February 2027 | Strategy document - PHC | |
| Costing of the prioritized interventions | M7–M9 | 1 February 2027 – 30 April 2027 | PHC investment plan (costed) | |
| Stakeholder consultations and validation workshop | M8–M9 | 1 March 2027 – 30 April 2027 | PHC investment plan (costed) | |
| Drafting the investment plan (sequencing, costing, theory of change with indicators, project scopes) | M7–M9 | 1 February 2027 – 30 April 2027 | PHC investment plan (costed) | |
| Finalization, high-level presentation and launch | M10–M11 | 1 May 2027 – 30 June 2027 | PHC investment plan (costed) | |
| Pipeline project scope development | M10–M12 | 1 May 2027 – 31 July 2027 | Project scoping - PHC | |
| Deliverable 2: National Harmonized Health Facilities Assessment report | Consultant recruitment | M1–M2 | 1 August 2026 – 30 September 2026 | HHFA and situational diagnosis |
| TWG orientation and HHFA tools adaptation | M3–M4 | 1 October 2026 – 30 November 2026 | HHFA and situational diagnosis | |
| Training field teams | M4 | 1 November 2026 – 30 November 2026 | HHFA and situational diagnosis | |
| HHFA data collection | M4–M5 | 1 November 2026 – 31 December 2026 | HHFA and situational diagnosis | |
| Data cleaning, gap analysis and report writing | M5–M7 | 1 December 2026 – 28 February 2027 | HHFA and situational diagnosis | |
| HHFA findings inform the investment plan prioritization | M5 | 1 December 2026 – 31 December 2026 | PHC investment plan (costed) | |
| Deliverable 3: Health Sector Public Finance Management (PFM) assessment | Consultants recruitment | M1 | 1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 | PFM |
| PFMA TWG orientation | M2 | 1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026 | PFM | |
| PFMA field data collection and key informants | M2–M5 | 1 September 2026 – 31 December 2026 | PFM | |
| PFMA analysis and final report | M5–M6 | 1 December 2026 – 31 January 2027 | PFM | |
| PFMA findings inform the investment plan | M5 | 1 December 2026 – 31 December 2026 | Investment case - PHC | |
| Reports | HIIP project technical and financial report | M6 | 1 January 2027 – 31 January 2027 | HIIP contractual reporting |
| HIIP project technical and financial report | M12 | 1 July 2027 – 31 July 2027 | HIIP contractual reporting |
Plan against contract
For each workstream the contract names, the latest contractual end date against the workstream’s validation date in the plan. A positive gap means the plan runs past the contract.
| Workstream | Contract ends | Plan validates | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment case - PHC | 31 December 2026 | 26 February 2027 | +57 days Past contract |
| Background document - PHC | 31 October 2026 | 6 November 2026 | +6 days Past contract |
| PFM | 31 January 2027 | 18 December 2026 | -44 days |
| PHC investment plan (costed) | 30 June 2027 | 23 April 2027 | -68 days |
| HHFA and situational diagnosis | 28 February 2027 | 18 December 2026 | -72 days |
| Project scoping - PHC | 31 July 2027 | 23 April 2027 | -99 days |
| Strategy document - PHC | 28 February 2027 | 20 November 2026 | -100 days |
Source: HIIP Proposal for Actions - Angola. Estimated budget USD 786,542. Team leader: Tomas Valdez. Cleared by the HIIP committee on 24/03/2026; WR on 28/04/2026.
- The founding document recognises three contractual deliverables and two reports. The remaining products in the plan are intermediate work supporting them.
- Compare these dates with the Master and Roadmap tabs: where they diverge, the contract prevails.
- September 2026 revision: the HHFA and PFM now have a December 2026 horizon; the HHFA will be a light version supporting the expansion of the Angolan tool already in use, in coordination with GEPE.
The workstreams
TWG-PHC
The technical working group for primary health care is the body the rest of the plan answers to: 6 of the other workstreams have their external validation at a TWG-PHC session. Reconstituting it is not one workstream among others but the precondition that governs the calendar. It is also where the plan is currently held up from outside: its work cannot move until the Ministry does.
When: 23 October 2026
Status: Not started
Authorities formally clear the reconstitution of the group; refoundation session held with quorum; workplan accepted by members
3 outputs and 18 tasks, across S3–S9. None done yet.
Due 9 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. List of former members identified; representation gaps identified; ToR drafted and circulated; workplan drafted; invitations and clearance request prepared
Deadlock Awaiting developments with MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map and re-engage TWG-PHC stakeholders | S3 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Identify the actors previously convened | S3 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Identify which actors are still to be convened | S3 | 1 d | Former members identified | Backlog |
| Draft and circulate the TWG-PHC Terms of Reference | S3 | 2 d | Stakeholder mapping | Backlog |
| Plan the working group activities | S4 | 3 d | List of actors | Backlog |
| Prepare the clearance request to the authorities | S5 | 1 d | Workplan | Backlog |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Fortnightly calendar and standing agenda template established; inaugural meeting held with minutes; fortnightly reporting under way
Deadlock Awaiting developments with MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set the fortnightly calendar and standing agenda template | S6 | 1 d | Refoundation session | Backlog |
| Hold the inaugural TWG-PHC meeting | S6 | 1 d | Meeting scheduled | Backlog |
| Fortnightly progress reporting to Indrajit and Tomás | Recurring | 1 d | — | Backlog |
Due 4 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Scope and membership defined for the three subgroups; list of management materials and training needs matrix produced
Deadlock Awaiting developments with MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define the clinical protocols subgroup (scope and members) | S7 | 2 d | Inaugural meeting | Backlog |
| Define the patient referral guides subgroup | S7 | 2 d | Inaugural meeting | Backlog |
| Define the PHC information digitalisation subgroup | S8 | 2 d | Inaugural meeting | Backlog |
| Identify management materials needed by facility and district managers | S8 | 3 d | Pilot visits | Backlog |
| Identify specific training needs for the reform | S9 | 3 d | Pilot visits | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
Deadlock Awaiting developments with MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obtain formal clearance from the authorities | S5 | 2 d | Clearance request; DNSP consent | Backlog |
| Invite the authorities and the members | S6 | 1 d | Formal clearance | Backlog |
| Schedule the meeting with all members | S6 | 1 d | Invitations sent | Backlog |
| Hold the refoundation session | S6 | 1 d | Meeting scheduled | Backlog |
Background document - PHC
The diagnosis. It inherits work by earlier consultants, which is audited before being reused, and combines a quantitative backbone with pilot field visits. It is the direct input to the strategy document: no strategic prioritisation can be defended without it.
When: 6 November 2026
Status: Not started
Presented to the TWG-PHC; position recorded on the diagnosis; minutes with comments and owners; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
7 outputs and 31 tasks, across S1–S7. 16 done.
Due 28 August 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. Methodology previously applied identified; inventory of data collected and still to collect; record of what was promised to the client, with deadlines and products; gaps listed
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meetings with the consultants | S1 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Identification of the methodology previously applied | S1 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Inventory of data collected and still to be collected | S2 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Record of what was promised to the client, with deadlines and products | S2 | 2 d | — | Done |
Due 11 September 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. Document structured around the operational framework levers; interview guides mapped to the levers; consultants’ material mapped; presentation format for barriers, gaps, bottlenecks and strengths defined
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure the document around the operational framework levers | S3 | 2 d | Audit | Done |
| Rewrite the interview guides mapped to the levers | S3 | 3 d | Analytical structure | Done |
| Map the consultants’ material against the levers | S3 | 2 d | Analytical structure | Done |
| Define how barriers, gaps, bottlenecks and strengths will be presented | S3 | 1 d | — | Done |
Due 11 September 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. Indicators extracted with extraction date; quality and completeness assessed; anomalies listed to probe in the field
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract the DHIS2 indicators | S3 | 3 d | — | Done |
| Assess the quality and completeness of the extracted data | S3 | 2 d | DHIS2 extraction | Done |
| Identify anomalies to probe in the field | S3 | 1 d | Quality assessment | Done |
Due 11 September 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. DNSP consent recorded; HHFA items selected with justification; questionnaires tested on the device before departure; list of facilities and informants agreed
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Request DNSP consent for the pilot visits and interviews | S3 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Select which HHFA items to capture in this pilot | S3 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Prepare the questionnaires from the HHFA | S3 | 3 d | HHFA item selection | Done |
| Load the questionnaires into KoboToolbox | S3 | 1 d | Questionnaires prepared | Done |
| Define facilities, dates and informant profiles | S3 | 2 d | DNSP consent | Done |
Due 25 September 2026 · Status Not started Delayed
Definition of done. Planned facilities visited; Kobo data synchronised; interview notes transcribed; instrument limitations noted
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conduct the visits to health facilities | S4 | 6 d | Pilot visits preparation | Backlog |
| Conduct interviews with health workers and local, provincial and national managers | S4 | 4 d | Pilot visits preparation | Backlog |
| Record and organise the material collected | S4 | 2 d | Visits carried out | Backlog |
| Record the pilot lessons for the HHFA design | S4 | 1 d | Visits carried out | Backlog |
Due 9 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Findings coded; barriers, gaps, bottlenecks and strengths classified by structure, process and outcome and mapped to the levers; current care model described; informants’ evidence contrasted with current scientific evidence
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code and synthesise the qualitative findings | S5 | 4 d | Pilot visits carried out | Backlog |
| Map barriers, gaps, bottlenecks and strengths by structure, process and outcome | S5 | 3 d | Qualitative synthesis | Backlog |
| Describe the current care model | S5 | 3 d | Qualitative synthesis | Backlog |
| Contrast the informants’ evidence with current scientific evidence | S5 | 3 d | Mapping | Backlog |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Presentation format applied; contrast section written; language adapted to the client; evidence and references reviewed; country office review resolved
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft the contrast section between what is believed and what was observed | S5 | 2 d | Synthesis and mapping | Backlog |
| Draft the background document v1 | S5 | 5 d | Synthesis and mapping | Backlog |
| Adapt the language to the client | S6 | 2 d | Background document v1 | Backlog |
| Review evidence and references | S6 | 2 d | Background document v1 | Backlog |
| Country office review | S6 | 2 d | Background document v1 | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present the document to the TWG-PHC for validation | S6 | 1 d | TWG-PHC refounded; Background v1 | Backlog |
| Incorporate the TWG-PHC comments | S7 | 2 d | Validation session | Backlog |
Strategy document - PHC
Turns the diagnosis into choices through an explicit chain: map of barriers and gaps, theory of change, prioritised areas. Validation requires the Ministry to confirm that the strategy serves as the enabling policy document; without that, the investment plan and the essential package have no normative basis.
When: 20 November 2026
Status: Not started
Presented to the TWG-PHC; position recorded on each prioritized area (accepted/amended/rejected); minutes with decisions and owners; MINSA confirms it serves as the enabling policy document; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
3 outputs and 9 tasks, across S5–S8. None done yet.
Due 9 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Items classified by structure, process and outcome and mapped to the framework levers; each item with an identified source; candidate interventions with reference and level of evidence
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map barriers, gaps, bottlenecks and strengths by structure, process and outcome | S5 | 4 d | Field qualitative synthesis | Backlog |
| Review evidence on interventions for each barrier, gap and bottleneck | S5 | 5 d | Barrier map | Backlog |
Due 9 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Barrier > intervention > outcome chain made explicit; each option with relative cost, time to effect and preconditions; discarded alternatives with the reason; candidate areas and actions for prioritization identified
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design the theory of change | S5 | 3 d | Evidence table | Backlog |
| Build the menu of options for debate | S5 | 3 d | Theory of change | Backlog |
| Identify areas and actions for prioritization | S5 | 3 d | Menu of options | Backlog |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Covers all framework levers; each recommendation traceable to a barrier and its evidence; prioritization criteria explicit; country office review resolved; Portuguese version ready
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft the strategy v1 | S5 | 5 d | Prioritized areas and actions | Backlog |
| Internal review and pre-alignment with MINSA | S6 | 2 d | Strategy v1 | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hold the validation policy dialogue | S7 | 2 d | TWG-PHC refounded; Strategy v1 | Backlog |
| Incorporate the agreed changes | S8 | 3 d | Policy dialogue | Backlog |
HHFA and situational diagnosis
Revised in September 2026. The inter-agency agreement with UNICEF and UNFPA was abandoned and replaced by an approach to GEPE, the Ministry’s planning and statistics office. The HHFA becomes a light version built into the Angolan assessment tool already in use, in support of the Health Map (Mapa Sanitário), on a December 2026 horizon. Its legacy is a proposal to extend that tool with the HHFA items, so that assessment does not end with the project. The instrument itself is covered in the HHFA part of this notebook.
When: 18 December 2026
Status: Not started
Light HHFA presented and accepted; support to the Health Map (Mapa Sanitário) and to the expansion of the Angolan tool already in use agreed with GEPE
8 outputs and 26 tasks, across S3–S10. None done yet. 3 abandoned.
Due 9 October 2026 · Status Abandoned
Definition of done. Shared scope agreed; cost sharing defined; co-financing agreement formalised
Deadlock Agreement with UNICEF and UNFPA abandoned; replaced by the approach to GEPE
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continue the alignment meetings with UNICEF and UNFPA | S3 | 2 d | — | Abandoned |
| Define the shared scope and cost sharing | S4 | 2 d | Alignment meetings | Abandoned |
| Formalise the co-financing agreement | S5 | 2 d | Scope and costs defined | Abandoned |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status In progress
Definition of done. Scope of WHO support to the Health Map (Mapa Sanitário) agreed with GEPE; WHO local resources identified and allocated; plan to strengthen data management and collection agreed
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish the approach to GEPE | S4 | 2 d | — | In progress |
| Define WHO support to producing the Health Map | S5 | 2 d | Approach to GEPE | Backlog |
| Map the WHO local resources available for data management and collection | S5 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Agree with GEPE the plan to strengthen data management and collection | S6 | 2 d | Health Map support defined | Backlog |
Due 11 September 2026 · Status In progress Critical
Definition of done. Sample and ToR obtained and analysed; gaps against the HIIP questions identified in writing; margin for adding items confirmed with UNFPA; data collection schedule known and recorded
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obtain and review the sampling, ToR and contract already decided | S3 | 1 d | — | Backlog |
| Assess whether the sample serves the PHC diagnosis questions | S3 | 2 d | Sampling obtained | Backlog |
| Identify the margin for adding items to the instrument | S3 | 1 d | Sample assessment | Backlog |
| Take part in the kick-off meeting with the contracted firm | S3 | 1 d | — | Backlog |
| Align the data collection schedule with the HIIP calendar | S3 | 1 d | Kick-off meeting | Backlog |
Due 9 October 2026 · Status In progress
Definition of done. HHFA items for the pilot selected with justification; list of summary structure, process and outcome items defined from the pilot
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Select the HHFA items to capture in the pilot | S3 | 2 d | Margin for adding items confirmed | Backlog |
| Define the list of summary items from the pilot | S5 | 3 d | Pilot visits carried out | Backlog |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Angolan tool in use reviewed; light set of HHFA items selected and integrated into the tool; tool tested; mixed-methods design documented
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review the Angolan assessment tool already in use | S5 | 2 d | Approach to GEPE | Backlog |
| Select the light set of HHFA items to add to the tool | S5 | 2 d | Tool review; list of summary items | Backlog |
| Integrate the items into the Angolan tool and test it | S6 | 3 d | Items selected | Backlog |
| Document the exploratory sequential mixed-methods design | S6 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
Due 20 November 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Collection under way according to schedule, using WHO local resources; quality monitored by wave
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow the training of the data collection teams | S7 | 2 d | Tool tested | Backlog |
| Follow the field logistics | S7 | 1 d | — | Backlog |
| Monitor data quality by wave | Recurring | 1 d | Collection under way | Backlog |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Dataset cleaned and documented; analysis completed; light HHFA report drafted
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean and organise the dataset | S9 | 2 d | Collection completed | Backlog |
| Analyse the data | S9 | 3 d | Dataset cleaned | Backlog |
| Draft the light HHFA report | S10 | 4 d | Analysis | Backlog |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Proposal to expand the Angolan tool in use, with the HHFA items, submitted to GEPE and MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propose expanding the Angolan tool for routine facility assessment | S10 | 3 d | Light HHFA report | Backlog |
| Present the proposal to GEPE and MINSA | S10 | 1 d | Proposal drafted | Backlog |
PFM
Public financial management. It runs with its own working group, the TWG-PFM, separate from the TWG-PHC and with its own validation, and shares the December 2026 horizon with the HHFA. The method that structures it is covered in the FinHealth 2.0 part of this notebook.
When: 18 December 2026
Status: Not started
Assessment presented to the TWG-PFM; position recorded; minutes with decisions; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
5 outputs and 24 tasks, across S1–S10. 13 done.
Due 25 September 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. ToR approved by MINSA; membership confirmed; preparatory interview report shared; minutes of the inaugural session with an agreed workplan
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finalise the TWG-PFM Terms of Reference | S1 | 2 d | — | Done |
| Confirm the list of participants | S2 | 2 d | ToR | Done |
| Organise the calendar and send the invitations | S3 | 2 d | List of participants | Done |
| Conduct the preparatory interviews with members | S3 | 4 d | Invitations | Done |
| Produce the preparatory interview report | S4 | 3 d | Preparatory interviews | Done |
| Hold the inaugural session | S4 | 1 d | Interview report | Done |
| Agree the workplan and the fortnightly calendar | S4 | 1 d | Inaugural session | Done |
Due 6 November 2026 · Status Done
Definition of done. ToR approved; contract signed; local specialist on board; inception report accepted
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting with the World Bank on financing the local specialist | S3 | 1 d | — | Done |
| Draft the consultancy ToR and specifications | S4 | 3 d | Interview report | Done |
| Run the selection process | S5 | 5 d | Consultancy ToR | Done |
| Contract the consultancy | S6 | 2 d | Selection process | Done |
| Bring the local specialist on board | S6 | 3 d | World Bank agreement | Done |
| Inception meeting and workplan validation | S7 | 2 d | Contract signed | Done |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status In progress
Definition of done. Fortnightly meetings held with minutes; first draft reviewed; final report accepted
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run the fortnightly TWG-PFM meetings | Recurring | 1 d | Inaugural session | In progress |
| Supervise the interviews and activities with the group | Recurring | 2 d | Inception meeting | In progress |
| Review the consultancy first draft | S8 | 2 d | Consultancy under way | Backlog |
| Review and accept the final report | S10 | 3 d | First draft | Backlog |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status In progress
Definition of done. Weekly workshops held with a record; health public finance management concepts aligned with the group; FinHealth tool learned and applied
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run weekly workshops with the group | Recurring | 1 d | Inaugural session | In progress |
| Align health public finance management concepts with the group | S5 | 2 d | Workshops under way | In progress |
| Learn the FinHealth tool | S5 | 3 d | — | In progress |
| Apply the FinHealth tool with the group | S7 | 3 d | Tool learned | Backlog |
Due 20 November 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Division of labour documented with UNDP and the World Bank
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Align with UNDP and the World Bank on the PFM modernisation workstreams | S4 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Document the division of labour between the three institutions | S8 | 1 d | Alignment | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present the assessment to the TWG-PFM for validation | S10 | 1 d | Final report | Backlog |
Investment case - PHC
The only product with two external validations: a political dialogue with the Minister on the first version, and a technical validation of the second, with HHFA data, by the TWG-PHC. The split recognises that persuading and proving are distinct moments, with different audiences and different criteria.
When: 26 February 2027
Status: Not started
Two validations: internal MINSA dialogue with the Minister on v1 (06/11/2026); technical validation of v2, with HHFA, by the TWG-PHC (26/02/2027)
4 outputs and 13 tasks, across S5–S14. None done yet.
Due 9 October 2026 · Status In progress
Definition of done. Document structure agreed internally; key actors identified by position and influence; sequence of conversations planned up to November
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define the structure of the investment case | S5 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Identify the actors whose support gives the document weight inside MINSA | S5 | 2 d | — | Backlog |
| Plan the engagement of those actors throughout production | S5 | 2 d | Actors identified | Backlog |
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Financing data gathered with source and extraction date; donor mapping obtained from project scoping; financing gap estimated in order of magnitude
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gather the available financing data | S6 | 3 d | — | Backlog |
| Obtain the project and donor mapping from project scoping | S6 | 1 d | Donor mapping | Backlog |
| Estimate the PHC financing gap in order of magnitude | S6 | 3 d | Financing data | Backlog |
Due 6 November 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Narrative per prioritized area written; country office review resolved; dated version ready for the dialogue with the Minister
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Write the investment narrative per prioritized area | S6 | 4 d | Strategy v1; evidence base | Backlog |
| Draft the investment case v1 | S7 | 5 d | Investment narrative | Backlog |
| Country office review | S7 | 2 d | Investment case v1 | Backlog |
Due 26 February 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. HHFA findings incorporated; figures revised; dated version
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incorporate the HHFA findings | S14 | 4 d | HHFA report | Backlog |
| Revise the figures and the narrative | S14 | 2 d | HHFA findings incorporated | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present v1 at the internal MINSA dialogue with the Minister | S7 | 1 d | Investment case v1 | Backlog |
| Present v2 to the TWG-PHC for validation | S14 | 1 d | Investment case v2 | Backlog |
PHC investment plan (costed)
Turns the strategy into figures. The order matters: consensus on the investment areas comes before any costing, because costing before deciding where to invest produces a number nobody owns.
When: 23 April 2027
Status: Not started
Plan validated by the TWG-PHC; position recorded; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
5 outputs and 15 tasks, across S11–S20. None done yet.
Due 29 January 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Stakeholder buy-in recorded; technical prioritization completed; political consensus obtained; government due process followed and documented
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obtain stakeholder buy-in on the geographic and thematic areas | S11 | 4 d | PFM; HHFA; background document; strategy document; investment case | Backlog |
| Run the technical prioritization | S11 | 4 d | Stakeholder buy-in | Backlog |
| Build the political consensus | S12 | 3 d | Technical prioritization | Backlog |
| Follow the due process within government | Recurring | 2 d | Political consensus | Backlog |
Due 29 January 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. National health accounts mapped; World Bank resource tracking verification completed; donor resource tracking matrix built
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map the national health accounts relevant to PHC | S11 | 4 d | PFM (final report) | Backlog |
| Verify whether the World Bank has done resource tracking and obtain the data | S11 | 1 d | — | Backlog |
| Build the donor resource tracking matrix | S12 | 5 d | Resource tracking verification | Backlog |
Due 26 February 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Planning exercises held per area; deep dive documented; investment packages defined and translated into action plans
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run the action planning exercises per investment area | S13 | 5 d | Consensus on areas | Backlog |
| Run the implementation deep dive per area | S13 | 8 d | Planning exercises | Backlog |
| Define the investment packages and translate them into action plans | S14 | 5 d | Deep dive | Backlog |
Due 26 March 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Investment packages costed; financing needs and donor coordination forecast
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost the investment packages | S15 | 8 d | Packages defined | Backlog |
| Forecast financing needs and donor coordination | S16 | 4 d | Costing; resource tracking matrix | Backlog |
Due 4 June 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Plan v1 consolidated; post-validation revision done; final plan handed over to MINSA
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidate the investment plan v1 | S17 | 6 d | Costing and forecasting | Backlog |
| Post-validation revision and handover to MINSA | S20 | 4 d | Validation; donor meetings | Backlog |
Tasks with no intermediate output: they serve this workstream’s external validation directly.
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hold the investment plan validation policy dialogue | S18 | 2 d | Investment plan v1 | Backlog |
Essential package - PHC
Defines what primary care should actually offer, by filtering the UHC Compendium down to the primary care level and fitting it to the country’s epidemiological profile.
When: 15 January 2027
Status: Not started
Essential package presented to the TWG-PHC; position recorded; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
4 outputs and 9 tasks, across S8–S11. None done yet.
Due 20 November 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Service inclusion criteria defined; scope delimited by facility level
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define the criteria for including services in the package | S8 | 3 d | Strategy validated | Backlog |
| Delimit the scope by health facility level | S8 | 2 d | Inclusion criteria | Backlog |
Due 4 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Interventions filtered for the PHC level; selection adapted to the epidemiological profile and installed capacity; comparison with current provision documented
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filter the UHC Compendium interventions applicable at PHC level | S9 | 3 d | Criteria and scope | Backlog |
| Adapt the selection to Angola’s epidemiological profile and installed capacity | S9 | 3 d | Compendium selection | Backlog |
| Compare the selection with what facilities actually provide today | S9 | 2 d | Pilot; HHFA | Backlog |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Package drafted; resource implications estimated per service included
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft the essential package v1 | S10 | 5 d | Compendium selection | Backlog |
| Estimate resource implications per service included | S10 | 3 d | Package v1 | Backlog |
Due 15 January 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Implementation indicators defined; monitoring and evaluation indicators defined
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define implementation indicators | S11 | 2 d | Package v1 | Backlog |
| Define monitoring and evaluation indicators | S11 | 2 d | Package v1 | Backlog |
Care model and professional profiles - PHC
The operational counterpart of the essential package: where the package says what, this workstream says by whom and how — team composition, the functions actually performed, professional profiles.
When: 15 January 2027
Status: Not started
Model presented to the TWG-PHC; position recorded; agreed changes incorporated in a dated version
4 outputs and 13 tasks, across S6–S10. None done yet.
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Current model described; limitations identified from field interviews; team composition and functions actually performed mapped
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Describe the care model currently in place in PHC | S6 | 3 d | Field qualitative synthesis | Backlog |
| Identify the limitations of the current model | S6 | 2 d | Current model described | Backlog |
| Map current team composition and the functions actually performed | S6 | 3 d | Pilot visits | Backlog |
Due 20 November 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Principles defined; proposed model designed; articulation with the essential package made explicit
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define the principles of the new model | S8 | 2 d | Diagnosis of the current model | Backlog |
| Design the proposed model | S8 | 5 d | Principles defined | Backlog |
| Articulate the model with the essential package | S8 | 2 d | Package criteria | Backlog |
Due 4 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Actions per professional cadre derived from the UHC Compendium; team redesign proposed; training and staffing implications identified
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derive actions per professional cadre from the UHC Compendium | S9 | 4 d | Compendium selection | Backlog |
| Define the specific actions of each professional cadre | S9 | 3 d | Compendium actions | Backlog |
| Propose the team redesign | S9 | 3 d | Actions per cadre | Backlog |
| Identify training and staffing implications | S9 | 2 d | Team redesign | Backlog |
Due 18 December 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Document drafted; professional bodies consulted; country office review resolved
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draft the care model document | S10 | 5 d | Professional profiles | Backlog |
| Consult the professional orders and associations | S10 | 3 d | Document drafted | Backlog |
| Country office review | S10 | 2 d | Document drafted | Backlog |
Project scoping - PHC
Maps who already finances primary care, where and for what, identifies overlaps and gaps, and turns the result into project profiles that can be put to financiers.
When: 23 April 2027
Status: Not started
Project profiles reviewed with MINSA and prospective financiers
2 outputs and 6 tasks, across S6–S18. None done yet.
Due 23 October 2026 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Projects financing PHC mapped; who funds what, for what and where identified; geographic and thematic overlaps and gaps identified
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map the projects currently financing PHC | S6 | 3 d | — | Backlog |
| Identify who funds what, for what and where | S6 | 3 d | Projects mapped | Backlog |
| Identify geographic and thematic overlaps and gaps | S6 | 2 d | Mapping | Backlog |
Due 23 April 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Areas selected with MINSA; profiles developed; profiles reviewed with MINSA and financiers
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Select 2 to 3 areas for profile development | S16 | 2 d | Investment packages | Backlog |
| Develop the project profiles | S17 | 10 d | Areas selected | Backlog |
| Review the profiles with MINSA and prospective financiers | S18 | 4 d | Profiles developed | Backlog |
Financing mobilisation - PHC
The end of the arc: engaging the European Investment Bank, other donors and the EU delegation, and a World Bank loan. Its validation is the furthest away in time and depends on almost every other workstream.
When: 18 June 2027
Status: Not started
Financier commitments recorded; loan proposal signed
2 outputs and 8 tasks, across S17–S21. None done yet.
Due 7 May 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. EIB engaged in the discussions and in prioritization; other donors and the EU delegation mapped; validation and buy-in meetings held with a record
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engage the EIB in the discussions on investment areas | S17 | 3 d | Investment plan v1 | Backlog |
| Involve the EIB in the prioritization exercises | S18 | 3 d | EIB engaged | Backlog |
| Map other donors and the EU delegation | S18 | 3 d | — | Backlog |
| Organise the validation and buy-in meetings | S19 | 5 d | Donors mapped | Backlog |
Due 18 June 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Document pack prepared; single dated version on both routes; technical queries answered; final proposal consolidated
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prepare the document pack for the World Bank | S19 | 3 d | Investment case; investment plan | Backlog |
| Ensure the version going through the Minister and through WHO is the same, dated | S19 | 1 d | Document pack | Backlog |
| Follow the negotiation and answer technical queries | S20 | 4 d | Pack delivered | Backlog |
| Consolidate the final proposal | S21 | 5 d | Negotiation | Backlog |
HIIP contractual reporting
Contractual reporting obligations. The only workstream with no external validation, because the test is not acceptance by a technical client but meeting the contractual deadline.
No external validation recorded: the test for this workstream is meeting the contractual deadline.
2 outputs and 4 tasks, across S3–S25. None done yet.
Due 11 September 2026 · Status Not started Critical
Definition of done. Project month 1 (M1) confirmed; M6 and M12 report dates converted into calendar dates and entered in the plan
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirm project month 1 (M1) with the country office | S3 | 1 d | — | Backlog |
| Convert M6 and M12 into calendar dates and enter them in the plan | S3 | 1 d | M1 confirmed | Backlog |
Due 30 July 2027 · Status Not started
Definition of done. Interim (M6) and final (M12) technical and financial reports submitted and accepted within contractual deadlines
| Task | Sprint | Est. | Depends on | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interim technical and financial report (M6 - January 2027) | S12 | 5 d | Reporting calendar | Backlog |
| Final technical and financial report (M12 - July 2027) | S25 | 5 d | Reporting calendar | Backlog |